A brand new entrance has opened within the ongoing turf struggle on the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, with Director Anju Seth, this time, writing to the federal government towards the institute’s Chairman.
Seth, The Indian Express has learnt, has written to the Ministry of Education alleging that the Board of Governors, led by Chairman Shrikrishna Kulkarni, is infringing on her government powers.
The letter comes lower than two months after over 75% of the IIM-Calcutta school lodged an analogous criticism with the ministry towards Seth. The academics had alleged that the Director had centralised powers in her arms and usurped their administration- and decision-making roles.
Seth and Chairman Kulkarni didn’t reply to calls, SMS, and an electronic mail left by this newspaper.
Seth has, amongst different issues, instructed the federal government that she was sidelined in drafting new laws below the amended IIM Act. These laws are to assist oversee and information IIM administration below the brand new regulation. Incidentally, this too is just like what the school had alleged earlier — that they weren’t consulted by the Board or Seth within the formulation and adoption of the brand new laws.
Seth’s letter towards the institute chairman, simply as the school letter towards her, is extremely uncommon for an IIM.
Among the problems flagged by the academics earlier was school scarcity. Sources stated just one new school member had been employed within the final two years regardless of the institute dropping over 10 academics on account of resignation, superannuation and voluntary retirement. Some of the exits, the academics alleged, had been as a consequence of “harassment”.
The school additionally claimed that the disregard of their views on the brand new laws was not like what was performed by peer institutes reminiscent of IIM-A and IIM-B. The Academic Council, the school stated, was given solely 5 days to submit strategies on the draft laws, and their suggestions on centralisation of powers within the Board and Director was not thought-about by the Board whereas finalising the laws.
Seth had dismissed the allegations because the work of “a small group of individuals”, upset along with her efforts to foster a tradition of transparency and accountability. “We are pained by the baseless stories instigated by this small group to sully the institute’s reputation built over decades. Despite the challenges we have confronted, including those posed by the Covid crisis, we are now operating at even greater effectiveness and efficiency, with devotion to the success of our talented students. Having converted challenges into opportunities to strengthen our resilience, we are excited to march into the future with integrity and commitment to the pledge of ‘IIM First’, blessed by the good wishes and support of valued members of our faculty and extended community,” Seth had instructed The Indian Express in an electronic mail.