Virtual hearings. It is one thing that nobody had ever imagined. But these turned out to be the excessive level of the Chandigarh Courts within the Year of Covid. After an extended hiatus brought on by the lockdown when bodily distancing grew to become the norm, the courts warmed as much as the thought of hearings on-line.
As the yr handed by, many a vital case was heard and selected Cisco Webex and WhatsApp.
From bail issues to last orders, Chandigarh courts have been doing it by e-hearings by way of video conferencing. While the Punjab and Haryana High Court in addition to the Chandigarh District Court favor the Cisco Webex platform, the district courts have been listening to instances by way of WhatsApp video calls too.
Here is a fast recap of the instances that hogged the limelight in 2020.
The case of UT Inspector Jaswinder Kaur, Manimajra SHO, who was booked by CBI on graft expenses on June 29 following a entice on accused Bhagwan Singh, grabbed town’s eyeballs. Kaur was charged after Bhagwan Singh was caught red-handed whereas allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 1 lakh on her behalf. Kaur absconded after the FIR, and moved purposes for anticipatory bail on the district court docket and High Court, which have been dismissed. She lastly surrendered within the Court on July 25, and was granted bail by the CBI Court on September 15.
Sippy Sidhu homicide case got here to the fore on the fag finish of the yr when after 4 years of investigation within the homicide case of Sukmandeep Singh (Sippy) Sidhu, CBI submitted an ‘untraced report’ within the particular CBI court docket of Chandigarh. The court docket has now requested the CBI to additional make clear the paperwork and requested whether or not it was a last report, an untraced report or a easy standing report. CBI is more likely to file a recent report in January, 2021.
But earlier than the pandemic hit town, one case that induced a lot consternation among the many residents was the dispute regarding the Sukhna catchment space. In a big order within the Sukhna case, a division bench pronounced an order in March 2020, declaring constructions within the catchment space “as delineated in the map prepared by the Survey of India on 21.9.2004” as unlawful. It additionally imposed a positive of Rs 100 crore every on Punjab and Haryana for “allowing with impunity” building within the catchment space of the Sukhna Lake falling of their jurisdiction. The order was challenged once more earlier than the High Court, whereby a keep has been granted on the demolition, and price imposed on the 2 States.
In July, the High Court got here to the rescue of a layer operating from pillar to put up to get his painted automobile registered when it dominated that authorities couldn’t decline registration merely given that there was artwork work on its physique, and directed the Chandigarh Administration to register a multicolour Ambassador Grand Harit-C-1800 inside a interval of two weeks.
Another essential matter earlier than the court docket this yr pertained to the varsity charges. The Independent School Association together with seven different non-public colleges of Chandigarh moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court with regard to the Chandigarh administration order directing the non-public colleges to reschedule the final date for depositing charges for the session 2020-21.