Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi has declined the supply to return as India’s lawyer common, sources informed CNN-News18 on Sunday. The event got here every week after Rohatgi was reported to succeed senior lawyer KK Venugopal, who’s all set to demit workplace because the Legal professional Common of India on the finish of this month.
Ok Ok Venugopal, 91, was re-appointed as the highest regulation officer of the nation for 3 months on June 29. Nonetheless, whereas he had declined to proceed within the place on account of “private causes”, he later acceded to a request by the federal government, Legislation Ministry officers stated.
Venugopal was appointed in July 2017, succeeding Rohatgi. In response to stories, Rohatgi was set to take over on October 1 for his second stint because the nation’s lawyer common after his first from June 2014 to June 2017.
Legislation fraternity had termed the transfer as a “loss” and a acquire for the union authorities. Prateek Chadha, Advocate on File (AOR) of Supreme Courtroom had stated, “Rohatgi is a huge at our bar and a worthy alternative for the workplace of Legal professional Common. These of us who seem for personal events will miss the reassurance that being led by him in a matter brings however our loss is the Union of India’s acquire.”
Rohatgi, a veteran lawyer, has appeared in a number of high-profile circumstances within the Supreme courtroom in addition to excessive courts throughout the nation. Born on August 17, 1955, in Mumbai, he’s the son of former Delhi Excessive Courtroom choose Justice Awadh Behari Rohatgi and accomplished his schooling from Authorities Legislation Faculty in Mumbai. Enrolled on the Bar Council of Delhi in 1978, he was appointed as senior advocate inside 20 years in 1994.
Throughout his first stint which started in 2014 and continued until 2017, Rohatgi defended the federal government in numerous essential circumstances. He was appointed the AG quickly after the Bharatiya Janata Social gathering (BJP) authorities got here into energy.
He appeared for the Particular Investigation Group (SIT) within the apex courtroom, which had heard a plea by Zakia Jafri in connection to the 2002 Gujarat riots.
(With inputs from PTI)